Analyse-it® Method Evaluation Edition

Method validation software for IVDs, Clinical Laboratories and Researchers to validate, verify, and demonstrate analytical and diagnostic method performance.

#1 in Journal of Clinical Chemistry review of ROC curve software
The review in the Journal of Clinical Chemistry rated Analyse-it #1, better than both AccuRoc(#2, no longer available) and MedCalc(#3). Then we improved Analyse-it. It now includes all recommendations made in the review, and uses the latest algorithms. Read the review
Analyse-it includes ROC curve analysis (CLSI GP10), ROC curve plots, Kappa and Weighted Kappa (CLSI EP12) to help you determine the diagnostic ability of qualitative and quantitative diagnostic methods. ROC curve analysis lets you compare methods to find the best performing test, choose medical decision levels, or compare diagnostic performance of a new against existing method.

Visualise test performance with ROC curve plot

Plot upto 6 ROC curves to see the diagnostic performance of upto 6 test methods. From the plot you can see where tests are strongest, and see the medical decision points that best classify diseased and undiseased subjects.

ROC curve plot

Describe performance over all decision levels

Calculate true/false-positive & true/false-negative rates, predictive values, likelihood ratios and cost at each medical decision level.

Diagnostic performance at decision levels

Choose optimum medical decision levels with decision plots

Decision plots visualise diagnostic ability across all decision levels in terms of sensitivity & specificity, positive (LR+) & negative (LR-) likelihood ratios, positive & negative predictive values, or cost (in financial or health terms).

ROC decision plot

Compare upto 6 correlated diagnostic tests

DeLong, Delong, Clarke-Pearson is used to compare ROC curves -- the best method for comparing correlated ROC curves, a less parametric approach than the early 1980's Hanley & McNeil approach -- in fact, the method now recommend by Hanley & McNeil themselves. Provides statistical evidence of the best overall test.

Incorporate prevalence and costs

If available, include prevalance of the condition, or costs (in financial or health terms) of misdiagnosis for more accurate performance evaluation at medical decision levels.

Describe the performance of a qualitative test

Kappa and Weighted Kappa are included for comparing qualitative agreements between two judges/raters. Calculates sensitivity/specificity, likelihood ratios, and predictive values. Equivalent to CLSI EP12-A protocol.